Solar Water Heater vs PV Geyser Calculator
Two ways to heat water with the sun: a thermal solar water heater, or extra PV panels running your electric geyser. This tool works out your hot-water energy and compares both honestly.
1 Your hot water
Roughly 25–50 litres per person per day for bathing and washing.
From inlet to target: e.g. 20→45 °C = 25°C in the plains; winter or hill-station inlet water needs more.
2 The two options
A 150–200 LPD evacuated-tube system installed. It covers ~70% of annual hot-water energy (less in monsoon/winter).
Adding array capacity to an existing/new PV system (you already own a geyser). Assumes daytime heating or a timer.
Thermal output varies with season and climate — SWH solar fraction ~60–80% annually (assumed 70%). PV route assumes the geyser can heat during daylight or via a timer. India: some states subsidise SWH; check locally. Not a quote.
How this is calculated
litres × ΔT × 1.16 Wh — 150 L raised 25°C is ~4.35 kWh/day, ~1,590 kWh a year.SWH route: covers ~70% of that annually → saving = 0.7 × annual energy × rate; payback = cost ÷ saving.
PV route: array to generate the daily energy =
daily kWh ÷ (sun × 0.8); cost = kW × per-kW price; saving = full annual energy × rate (geyser now solar-powered by day); payback = cost ÷ saving.Two solar routes to hot water
Water heating is often a household’s second-biggest energy use, and there are two quite different ways to hand it to the sun. A solar water heater (SWH) is thermal: evacuated tubes or flat plates heat water directly into an insulated tank, at 3–4× the efficiency of PV per square metre of roof. The PV route adds panels to run your existing electric geyser — less efficient per square metre, but it shares hardware with the rest of your solar system, works in any season the sun shines, and produces general-purpose electricity whenever the geyser is off.
The physics is small; the habits are big
Heating 150 litres by 25°C takes about 4.4 kWh — modest — but repeated daily it is ~1,600 kWh a year, real money at any tariff. An SWH quietly delivers most of this with no moving parts and 15–20-year lifespans; its weakness is cloudy spells and winter, when the backup element runs (the ~70% annual solar fraction in the math). The PV route needs the geyser to heat when the sun is out — a timer or a smart switch — otherwise the panels export cheaply at noon while the geyser burns grid power at night.
Which wins?
On pure payback, the SWH usually wins where hot-water demand is steady and roofs are tight — it extracts more heat per square metre and costs less than the equivalent PV capacity. The PV route wins when you are already installing a PV system and can simply size it ~1 kW larger, when roof space is plentiful, or when you value flexibility (the same panels charge an EV or run the AC in seasons you need less hot water). In South Africa the same comparison applies to geyser conversions; a full savings model can fold either route into your whole-house numbers.
A worked example (India)
150 L/day raised 25°C at ₹8/kWh costs about ₹12,700 a year on a grid geyser. A ₹28,000 SWH saving 70% pays back in ~3.1 years. The PV route needs ~1.1 kW (₹60,000 at ₹55,000/kW) but offsets the full annual energy — payback ~4.7 years, and the panels keep earning after the tank is hot. Both beat the grid; which is ‘better’ depends on your roof and whether you are installing PV anyway.
Frequently asked questions
Per square metre of roof, yes — thermal collectors convert 50–70% of sunlight to heat versus ~21% for PV, so an SWH usually has the faster payback for dedicated water heating. But PV wins on flexibility: the same panels serve any load, all year.
Litres × temperature rise × 1.16 Wh. A typical 150 L at a 25°C rise is ~4.4 kWh per day — about 1,600 kWh a year, often 15–25% of a household bill in geyser-heavy homes.
Cloudy spells, monsoon weeks and cold inlet water in winter force the electric backup element to top up. Annual solar fractions of 60–80% are typical; the calculator uses 70% as an honest middle.
Yes — the simplest route is a timer so it heats during solar hours, or a dedicated PV-geyser controller. Without that timing, midday solar exports for a small credit while the geyser burns full-price grid power at night, and the savings evaporate.
Sources & standards
Thermal solar water heater performance figures and the PV-route comparison here follow the international test standard and India's national solar-thermal programme guidelines.
- ISO 9459 — Solar heating: domestic water heating systems — International Organization for Standardization
The standard test method for rating a solar water heater's thermal performance, underlying the collector efficiency figures used in this comparison. - Solar thermal / solar water heating programme — Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India
MNRE's national solar water heating guidelines set the typical solar-fraction and system-sizing conventions (such as the ~70% annual coverage assumed here). - Bureau of Indian Standards — Government of India
Publishes IS specifications for evacuated-tube and flat-plate solar collectors sold in India, referenced when comparing installed SWH costs. - Solar water heaters — U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
Background on solar-fraction ranges and payback expectations for U.S. installations, relevant to this calculator's US-dollar market option.